what if we're all characters in each other's dreams?
everyone's dream is different.
now i'm just exchanging the word "experience" for the word "dream."
OR, i'm just specifying a general condition with a more specific event.
but how do those experiences collide with each other or interact with each other?
are those what we call "relationships?"
i could dissect this for hours.
no i couldn't.
if all units of measurement can be divided in half, and if all denominators can rise to a figure of infinity... when we move, don't we move, simultaneously, no where AND across an eternity.
imagine the most minute speck of matter encompassing all of everything we know and don't know.
now imagine how much is in you. how much energy and life and potential.
am i really getting this stuff or am i regurgitating it because i watched a documentary on metaphysics yesterday? maybe i'm starting to get it because i'm making it materialize. it's passing through me, like water through a stream. the water changes the riverbed, kind of thing.
have humans lost the ability to apply the kind of potential that exists within this paradigm of thinking, or is the potential all an illusion caused by the structure of our language, our system of categorizing and understanding? is there a system which CAN encompass all this potential? or is ours a "lesser" system which creates this uncertainty... the potential for potential.
i am crazy.
i watched a show on lincoln today. abraham lincoln. they talked about how his mind moved. i think that experience was one of these three things: 1) i had a real, vital connection with abraham lincoln and the documentary today because i was earlier observing, with an air of annoyance, my brain's tendency to run away with itself and then the film i chose to take my mind off things begins talking about exactly the thing i was trying to NOT think of; (2) i was absorbing and conforming to these ideas because i am looking for a reason to my unhappiness; (3) i was projecting my thoughts into the movie in a metaphysical way, as the observer influences the surroundings as his/her observations are as much a product of "nature" as of the observer. after all, isn't the observer a PART of the nature she is observing?
number 3 may be a somehow combination of numbers 1 and 2. i haven't thought about it. but doesn't 3 seem to point to an aspect of human experience that seems so obvious? have humans really evolved into this hoard of creatures that believes itself to be so far removed from its past? maybe THAT'S why we can't predict the future... some sort of pride or hubris or something. we don't allow the "past" to communicate with us. we want nothing to do with it. so, it gets nothing of us. maybe THAT thought is arrogant enough.
i hope i have a lucid dream tonight.